Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar.
نویسنده
چکیده
s6756218Miscellaneous (editorials, letters)17812530Total2,081 2,0531 base and leveraging the database’s functions to pro-mote open access to research.
منابع مشابه
Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar literature searches.
BACKGROUND Literature searches are essential to evidence-based respiratory care. To conduct literature searches, respiratory therapists rely on search engines to retrieve information, but there is a dearth of literature on the comparative efficiencies of search engines for researching clinical questions in respiratory care. OBJECTIVE To compare PubMed and Google Scholar search results for cli...
متن کاملRetrieving Clinical Evidence: A Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for Quick Clinical Searches
BACKGROUND Physicians frequently search PubMed for information to guide patient care. More recently, Google Scholar has gained popularity as another freely accessible bibliographic database. OBJECTIVE To compare the performance of searches in PubMed and Google Scholar. METHODS We surveyed nephrologists (kidney specialists) and provided each with a unique clinical question derived from 100 r...
متن کاملGoogle Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough
BACKGROUND Recent research indicates a high recall in Google Scholar searches for systematic reviews. These reports raised high expectations of Google Scholar as a unified and easy to use search interface. However, studies on the coverage of Google Scholar rarely used the search interface in a realistic approach but instead merely checked for the existence of gold standard references. In additi...
متن کاملThe comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews
BACKGROUND The usefulness of Google Scholar (GS) as a bibliographic database for biomedical systematic review (SR) searching is a subject of current interest and debate in research circles. Recent research has suggested GS might even be used alone in SR searching. This assertion is challenged here by testing whether GS can locate all studies included in 21 previously published SRs. Second, it e...
متن کاملGoogle Scholar and the gray literature: A reply to Bonato's review
Recently, a review concluded that Google Scholar (GS) is not a suitable source of information “for identifying recent conference papers or other gray literature publications”. The goal of this letter is to demonstrate that GS can be an effective tool to search and find gray literature, as long as appropriate search strategies are used. To do this, we took as examples the same two case studies u...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
دوره 95 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007